🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to copy this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.